Am I Making A Silly Point?

village cricketThe very English game of Cricket has had a profound influence on global events, particularly in the last couple of hundred years. Actually, coming from the county of Kent in the south east of England, I need to change that to ‘the very Kentish game . .’ because its origins go back to the Weald of Kent in Saxon times. That said, how has this Kentish creation influenced world events . . ?

br empire pink_1

Britannia Rules OK!

Well, to start with, there is the British Empire which was the largest the world has ever known – as long as you don’t count the present US Empire (which they deny exists) that is! As Britain built and expanded its empire we introduced cricket to the defeated and crestfallen natives. We taught them the rules of the game, both written and unwritten. We taught them about fair-play, being a team player, honesty and accepting the umpire’s decision even when you knew it was wrong! We played by the ‘same rules’ on a ‘level playing field’ where everyone was equal. We dressed them in white, the colour of integrity and the ruling elite. Above all, we treated them as equals on the playing field and applauded them when they played well. We even accepted defeat by them with grace and gave them trophies. We drank tea with them and shared our cucumber sandwiches!


All India Cricket Team 1932

With all this equality on the playing field the natives forgot that their country was being plundered and they were being subjected to humiliation at every turn. Instead of fighting the British to a stand-still, ‘Johnny Foreigner’ accepted the empire/umpire’s bad decision, acknowledged the applause of players and spectators alike, tucked his bat under his arm and walked docilely back to the pavilion for the duration.

Countries like India became masters of the game of cricket, meanwhile they allowed the British to rule their country for a couple of hundred years with a relatively tiny administration whilst it was being robbed of anything that wasn’t nailed down. Cricket was the weapon of empire –a ‘weapon of mass deception’.

a Sahib and his Memsahib lording it over the natives

Moving on, there are Crickets, as in Bush Crickets! I would argue that crickets are named after cricket. I’m not suggesting that cricket is older than crickets which, after all and as fossil records prove, go back more than 350 million years to the Carboniferous Period. But crickets were definitely named after cricket and the evidence is in the records, so to speak.

cricket-fossilCrickets were first described, recorded and named as such by Linnaeus in 1748. Cricket, on the other hand, has its first recorded reference in a court legal document of 1598. Proof that crickets were named after cricket – although, as I said, I’m not suggesting that cricket was around before crickets. Crickets pre-date human-kind by quite a few million years and the way things are going they’ll probably be around for a few million after we kill ourselves off!

katydid emerging

a beautiful picture of a Green Bush Cricket shedding its old suit of clothes

Homo idioticus has been treating Mother Earth in much the same way that Britain treated its empire. Talking the eco-talk behind a smoke-screen of initiatives about ‘responsibility’ and ‘sustainability’ whilst actually accelerating the primitive plundering of resources. The latest batch of climate change models say it all – we are past the ‘tipping-point’, and change is compounding at an unprecedented rate.

arctic methgasFIGURE2Vast volumes of methane, a far more dangerous greenhouse gas, are erupting from the defrosting tundra and ‘boiling’ from the floor of the Arctic Ocean. By 2040 vast areas of the planet will be unviable for humans due to extremes of drought, flooding, sea level rise. Such is the speed of change that many species, particularly mammals, will fail to adapt – others, mostly insects and micro-organisms will do so and will flourish.

goodwin sands

cricket on the treacherous Goodwin Sands mid-channel (something I once did) a curious English pastime doomed to extinction along with the species

Mother Earth is not dying as some claim. Mother Earth is changing – evolving and adapting to the unnatural pressures of one ‘unnatural’ species.The umpire’s finger is raised and there will be no place for those who were stupid enough to believe that some ‘God’ gave them dominion over her.

Our innings is over – the Age of Man is passing!

Alan Fenn, Okçular Köyü (I also recognise that I need to get out more)

ps ‘Silly Point’ is a fielding position on the cricket field so called because it is just about the silliest place to be relative to a cricket ball coming off a bat at well over 100 mph! You need quick reactions – see below.

pps for those who don’t ‘get’ cricket here is a brief but famous explanation:

Cricket: As explained to a foreigner…
You have two sides, one out in the field and one in. Each man who’s in the side that’s in goes out, and when he’s out he comes in and the next man goes in until he’s out. When they are all out, the side that’s out comes in and the side that’s been in goes out and tries to get those coming in, out. Sometimes you get men still in and not out.

When a man goes out to go in, the men who are out try to get him out, and when he is out he goes in and the next man in goes out and goes in. There are two men called umpires who stay out all the time and they decide when the men who are in are out. When both sides have been in and all the men have been out, and both sides have been out twice after all the men have been in, including those who are not out, that is the end of the game!

18 thoughts on “Am I Making A Silly Point?

  1. If you’re fielding at long on – or long off for that matter, can you make an informed decision re leg before wicket? Just wondering!

    1. . . in a word ‘NO!’ In the interests of clarity, there are only two people who can make a decision of ‘Out!’ – an umpire based on his judgement and the batsman who decides to ‘walk’. LBW is a call made on line, length, height, position of the batsman, was he playing a stroke and so on. There is only one person (technology aside) in a position to make the call and that is the umpire at the non-striker’s end – everyone else is just chancing their arm!

  2. Alan, Your description of the rules of cricket are about as clear as mud. It would have taken us so long to learn the game, the British Empire would certainly have had us bamboozled! As for your direct truth-telling about the spot we’re in, we always find ourselves self-editing when we’re speaking with young people, for example. Don’t like to tell them we’re toast, whether it’s true or not.

  3. ahhh! The Rules of Cricket! The reason that, super-powerful as the country is, the US Empire will last a lot shorter time (climate collapse aside) than did the British Empire. US power is projected in a very blunt way – easy for the down-trodden to understand and rebel against. The bluntness of British power was hidden by a subtle blend of smoke and mirrors – rather like the frog in the slowly heating pot. Even Julius Caesar was wont to mutter (according to Shakespeare (I think)) ‘Beware perfidious Albion!’

  4. Alan, “perfidious Albion”? Thanks for the heads up on the meaning. The Amerikan empire will last a much shorter time, inşallah. No one can accuse them of subtlety – it’s all in your face.

  5. I will never understand, but then I also fail to understand the appeal of baseball, that bastardized American form of cricket.
    Simpler to just say some dudes try to hit a hard ball with a small piece of wood until the umpire tells them to go home?

    1. . . that’s exactly what I said at the end of the post! I’m surprised you guys ever managed to hold on to Hawaii!

  6. The history of cricket is so awesome that any cricket lover can’t neglect it that this one of the most passionate games in the world.

  7. hi
    The history of cricket is so awesome that any cricket lover can’t neglect it that this one of the most passionate games in the world.

  8. Loved the last part specially, which said “Cricket: As explained to a foreigner”, very simple and apt. NICE 🙂

  9. If India and Pakistan teams play as a combined team, i am sure they make unbeatable team. what you think ?

Comments are closed.